Independent critical study: Texts across time

Become a Centre Entries. English Literature. Connect with teachers via our online networking map The aim is to create an interactive map to support centres wishing to share experiences and ideas online and face-to-face. Sign up here Step-by-step guide to switching to Eduqas Compare and contrast the Eduqas specifications with the other major examination boards and find out why Eduqas is the right choice for your students. Inside English Blog The Inside English Blog will give subject-specific information as well as sharing teaching ideas, details of resources and ways to use them, and reflections from members of our English team.

A level English Literature Specification. A level English Literature Guidance for Teaching. Courses are available all over the UK as well as online. Book now. All Course Materials We offer a range of materials to support the teaching and learning of this qualification.

View all documents View all Past Papers Contact our team We are here to support you in the delivery of the new qualifications. Vieni a trovarci! I prossimi eventi. Cocktail sfiziosi. Ampia selezione di distillati.

English Department

Dipinti Street Art nel locale. The first section consists of a written examination comprised of a hour take-home examination in the major and minor fields. The second section is an oral examination. Exam Committee: Students must constitute an examining committee comprised of three faculty members, of which two must be Comparative Literature faculty see Faculty Roster on page 2 , in the quarter preceding the examination. Students should provide the Student Affairs Officer with the names and email address of their committee members and specify which faculty members will serve as the major and minor field examiners.

Reading Lists: Before the exam, students must compile reading lists comprised of 50 works in the major field and 25 works in the minor field. The major reading list must cover a range of genres and periods. Each student is responsible for preparing their own reading lists with guidance from appropriate faculty advisors.

Each reading list must be approved by the appropriate field examiner; both lists must be approved by the Director of Graduate Studies by the end of the quarter preceding the qualifying examination. Students should send their reading lists to the appropriate faculty in the major and minor fields first, with instructions to send their approval to the Director of Graduate Studies via email. Written Examination Procedures: Written exams consist of one long or two shorter questions for the major field exam and one question for the minor field.

Students are responsible for coordinating with the examining committee to determine the start of the hour exam period. The exam period should never be scheduled to begin or end outside of regular business hours including weekends, University holidays, or during the Winter campus closure.

The committee members who will write the major and minor field questions should be instructed to send their respective questions to the Student Affairs Officer at least one week before the start of the exam period. The Student Affairs Officer will send the exam questions to the student via email at the designated start time, with a CC to the examining committee members. Students are expected to demonstrate their knowledge of the field and engagement with relevant ideas and methodologies as they produce pages of original writing during the hour examination period.

These pages may not include any excerpts of previously written seminar papers. Plagiarism is grounds for dismissal from the program.


Once the student receives their questions they may not review or quote from any works that are not included in the reading lists. Students may quote from works on the reading lists, but quotations are not required. Should a question be deemed problematic i. Oral Examination Procedures: The oral examination follows no later than two weeks after the submission of the written portion. Students must pass both the written and oral sections of the exam in the major and minor fields in order to pass with permission to proceed to the prospectus phase of the dissertation.

In the case of failure, the committee may offer the student an opportunity to retake one or both sections of the exam in the following quarter. A second failed exam terminates the student from the program.


Academic Senate regulations require all doctoral students to complete and pass University written and oral qualifying examinations prior to doctoral advancement to candidacy. The University Oral Qualifying Examination is a two-hour examination based primarily on a defense of the prospectus. Under Senate regulations, the University Oral Qualifying Exam is open only to the student and appointed members of the doctoral committee.

All coursework and the second foreign language requirement must be completed before the second stage oral qualifying exam. Preparation: After completion of the first stage examination, students enroll in COM LIT under the supervision of their major field advisor to begin writing the dissertation prospectus. Although normative times for its completion vary, students would ideally produce a completed draft after two quarters. The prospectus should answer a question instead of merely outlining a description over the course of pages. Introduction The introduction provides background and explains the problem that the dissertation will attempt to solve; and highlights its significance.

Literature Review A concise review of past work on this topic. Specifies how the proposed dissertation will differ from, or expand upon, previous work. The literature review section will demonstrate participation in existing scholarly debates; knowledge of the relevant literature; and the contribution that this dissertation will make to the field. Theoretical Framework The methodology, or theoretical framework, addresses how students will answer their research questions.

The methodology explains how research will be conducted, proves that this method is feasible, and justifies that method as appropriate for the proposed project. Chapter Breakdown A tentative proposal for the internal organization of the dissertation should state the material that each chapter will cover, and convey how each chapter fits into the larger project. Why are the chapters ordered in a particular way? Are they more or less distinct, or do they trace an overarching narrative trajectory? Bibliography The bibliography can be a simple list of sources, or an annotated list.

Sources can be organized into primary and secondary sections, or divided by chapter. Students must circulate their prospectus to their committee at least two weeks in advance of the exam. All committee members must certify the dissertation. Students should nominate their examination committee at least two months in advance of the prospectus defense. Students must submit a Nomination of Doctoral Committee form that lists the names, departments, and academic ranks of the faculty who will administer the prospectus defense, and advise and certify the dissertation.

Results: The outcomes of the prospectus examination can be: pass with permission to advance to candidacy; or fail without permission to advance to candidacy. An unsatisfactory prospectus may be returned to the student for final revisions. If the prospectus is still deemed unsatisfactory, the student in question may fail the University Oral Qualifying Exam. Advancement to Candidacy: Students are advanced to candidacy and awarded the Candidate in Philosophy C.

Students are not obliged to duplicate the ideas of the prospectus in the dissertation. Basic concepts or assumptions may change from the prospectus to the dissertation; however, any such changes should be discussed with the committee as a different trajectory of investigation. Students should also consult with their faculty advisors regarding matters of breadth and focus. At minimum, faculty advisors should be in contact with their students once per quarter throughout the dissertation stage; however, more consistent contact is strongly encouraged.

Conversely, students should maintain the same degree of contact with their advisors. Issues regarding insufficient faculty guidance should be immediately brought to the attention of the Department Chair. The final draft of the dissertation must be submitted to the committee for review no later than two months prior to the planned date of filing to allow sufficient time for final revisions.

The Final Oral Examination is not required for all students in the program. The defense of the dissertation may be required for individual students at the discretion of their doctoral committees. By the twelfth quarter in the program, students must have completed the first and second stage of the qualifying examinations, and advance to doctoral candidacy. After advancement to doctoral candidacy, the dissertation normally takes one to three years to complete.

It must be completed no later than the third year after advancement to doctoral candidacy. A student who fails to meet the above requirements may be recommended for termination of graduate study. A graduate student may be disqualified from continuing in the graduate program for a variety of reasons. The most common is failure to maintain the minimum cumulative grade point average 3. Other examples include failure of examinations, lack of timely progress toward the degree and poor performance in core courses.

Aqa A-level English Literature Coursework - Word Limit?!

Probationary students those with cumulative grade point averages below 3. Students may be recommended for academic disqualification if their grade point average falls below a 3. A student may appeal a recommendation for academic disqualification to the program chair who will appoint a committee, which may include the chair, to review the recommendation, and if necessary, meet with the student.

During their first year of doctoral study, students are assigned a faculty mentor. Exam, and at least once yearly thereafter. Students whose grade-point average falls below 3. Each year, students are required to submit an end of the year assessment, which is reviewed by the faculty at the last faculty meeting of the year. Following the faculty meeting, the Director of Graduate Studies writes and sends a letter to each student indicating whether the student is making satisfactory or unsatisfactory degree progress.

Flag this list

Students who are interested in working with a particular faculty member early in their careers may wish to approach that person during their first two years of graduate study. Since a joint appointment in COM LIT is a faculty personnel matter, faculty in other departments who are interested in formalizing their affiliation with the Department must consult with the Department Chair and Academic Personnel Officer.

Exam, Qualifying Exam, and Ph. One of these three faculty members must be the Director of Graduate Studies, and at least one other must be faculty in the Department of Comparative Literature. Students should then clarify the role that they expect this faculty person to play on the committee Will this faculty member be responsible for writing one or more exam questions?

Example English Literature Coursework

Would the faculty person serve on the committee as a general arbiter of the quality of scholarship produced? At minimum, faculty advisors should be in contact with their students once per quarter throughout the dissertation stage; however, more frequent contact is strongly encouraged. Students who have yet to advance to doctoral candidacy must obtain approval from the committee and Department Chairs, as well as any faculty members who will be added to or removed from the committee.

Students who are advanced to doctoral candidacy must obtain approval from all committee members and the Department Chair before the Graduate Division will review the requests. Students who hold TA appointments in the Department must meet the following minimum requirements for employment each quarter:. Teaching Associate One academic year 3 academic year quarters or 2 semesters of UCLA TA experience or approved collegiate teaching experience at a comparable institution. Teaching Fellow Formally advanced to doctoral candidacy. The scales are updated annually. By exception, students who have advanced to doctoral candidacy may request approval to hold these titles for an additional 6 academic year quarters.

The Department may submit one request for up to one full academic year of additional teaching i. TAs must submit a written request for leave, including: short-term and long-term medical and family-related leave, pregnancy disability leave, and jury duty, to their faculty supervisor and the Student Affairs Officer as far in advance as possible.

Upon request, TAs will be required to provide appropriate documentation.